[grsec] gdb?

[jnf]

I apologize for not answering this previously, yes this worked just fine.
I guess I was confused on the differences between chpax and paxctl, and
had always tried previously with chpax and that failed.

I appreciate the help.

-jnf

--

There are only two choices in life. You either conform the truth to your desire,
or you conform your desire to the truth. Which choice are you making?


On Wed, 5 Oct 2005 pageexec at freemail.hu wrote:

> Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2005 13:25:25 +0200
> From: pageexec at freemail.hu
> To: Peter S. Mazinger <ps.m at gmx.net>, jnf <jnf at nosec.net>
> Cc: grsecurity at grsecurity.net
> Subject: Re: [grsec] gdb?
>
> On 4 Oct 2005 at 17:25, jnf wrote:
> > If I remove the -fno-pic -fno-pie and let it be an ET_DYN/PIE then it
> > works fine, so long as I turn off all the protections on it.
>
> did you try what i suggested before (paxctl -m)? that's all you
> need to get breakpoints (ptrace write access really) to work.
> and that's independent of the executable format, both ET_EXEC
> and ET_DYN/PIE should work just fine (i just verified it on an
> amd64-hardened-gentoo box).
>
>